Energy saving light bulbs is already more than ten years on the market, and yet the confusion around these energy-saving bulbs rather becomes even greater. No other light source is seen as skeptical. Begs the question, what are the reasons for these misconceptions, and why will it not want to provide clarity.
One of the reasons is that in all media considered up to the press too often, is that our global lighting market is undergoing rapid change. Never before has such dramatic changes in the field of lighting technology have taken place. Deltalight is an example for the same. Since the invention of the light bulb in 1879 took more than one hundred and twenty years, until they came as a much energy heating the headlines. Since then, only thirty years have passed, in which were always new bulbs invented by the contact fluorescent lamp with halogen to the latest LED lamps. That this development, which also takes place even in a highly competitive world market, can not proceed without injuries is more than understandable.
Saving light bulbs really reduce energy consumption?
The answer is clear. Each energy saving bulb, regardless of which version, lowers relative to conventional lamp energy consumption by at least 30, sometimes even 50 percent. These are well-founded laboratory data and only the promise of 70 percent, touting some cheap manufacturer on the packaging, advertising promises are unsustainable. Actually, the energy saving lamps should pave the way for a ubiquitous use is paved. Why, the reality is different?
The disadvantages of the energy-saving lamp
Energy saving light bulbs is compact fluorescent bulbs and their sale under two names causes confusion. How should the consumer that no one would expect such expertise, hinted at this point. the start of the use of energy saving lamps was devastating . They donated a harsh light, set fire slowly and did not have long life. In addition, they looked ugly and did not fit in any light. This situation has improved by advancements; these disadvantages could be overcome not. Final confusion was finally becoming aware that these bulbs contain mercury. A responsible disposal by consumers can not believe even the most daring optimist with restrictions. Countless broken energy saving light bulbs end up in household waste. Meanwhile bind the manufacturer, the mercury in amalgams, but now the ignition process requires more time. There are many models available in the market like,deltalight grid that are not just energy efficient, but also long lasting.
Include energy-saving lamps in the future?
A question: „Why is research feverishly on the development of LED lamps?“
The energy saver is to be regarded only as a temporary solution. Whether the ban on incandescent activism was the only political leaders, is another question. The future lies in LED. Still, they are far too expensive, but mass production and market orientation (unfortunately cheap competition with lousy quality) will lead to reasonable prices.